Online Dating with SilverSingles
I am a student studying evolution, and I noticed your website. My real comment to you regards your statement about Mount St. You state that “radioactive measurements of these rocks show them to be millions of years old” And why shouldn’t they be?
Radioactive Dating Explained – Part 2 It is sometimes claimed that the isochron method can determine the initial amount of daughter element, but that method.
Here I want to concentrate on another source of error, namely, processes that take place within magma chambers. To me it has been a real eye opener to see all the processes that are taking place and their potential influence on radiometric dating. Radiometric dating is largely done on rock that has formed from solidified lava. Lava properly called magma before it erupts fills large underground chambers called magma chambers.
Most people are not aware of the many processes that take place in lava before it erupts and as it solidifies, processes that can have a tremendous influence on daughter to parent ratios. Such processes can cause the daughter product to be enriched relative to the parent, which would make the rock look older, or cause the parent to be enriched relative to the daughter, which would make the rock look younger.
The simplest form of isotopic age computation involves substituting three measurements into an equation of four variables, and solving for the fourth. The equation is the one which describes radioactive decay:. Solving the equation for “age,” and incorporating the computation of the original quantity of parent isotope, we get:. Some assumptions have been made in the discussion of generic dating, for the sake of keeping the computation simple.
Such assumptions will not always be accurate in the real world. These include:. If one of these assumptions has been violated, the simple computation above yields an incorrect age. Note that the mere existence of these assumptions do not render the simpler dating methods entirely useless. In many cases, there are independent cues such as geologic setting or the chemistry of the specimen which can suggest that such assumptions are entirely reasonable.
However, the methods must be used with care — and one should be cautious about investing much confidence in the resulting age Isochron methods avoid the problems which can potentially result from both of the above assumptions. Isochron dating requires a fourth measurement to be taken, which is the amount of a different isotope of the same element as the daughter product of radioactive decay.
For brevity’s sake, hereafter I will refer to the parent isotope as P , the daughter isotope as D , and the non-radiogenic isotope of the same element as the daughter, as D i.
Historical Geology/U-Pb, Pb-Pb, and fission track dating
Radiometric rock dating, the methodology of determining the date of formation of a rock sample by the well-established rate of decay of the isotopes contained, depends on accurately determination of the starting points, the original concentrations of the isotopes. Many methods of estimating these beginning concentrations have been proposed, but all rest on tenuous assumptions which have limited their acceptance.
This paper attempts to show that the Isochron-Diagram method contains a logical flaw that invalidates it. This most accepted of all methods has two variations, the mineral isochron and the whole-rock isochron. The logically-sound authenticating mechanism of the mineral isochron is applied to the whole-rock isochron, where it is invalid. The long-term stability of the whole-rock is applied to the mineral, where it is inappropriate.
“Simple” radioactive dating can be visualized as using a kind of atomic are purely hypothetical — they were chosen so the explanation would be easy to.
Make a Donation Today. Give a Gift Membership. More Ways to Give. Member Services FAQs. Legacy Society. Science Champions Society. Free Memberships for Graduate Students. Employer Matching Gifts. Facebook Fundraisers. Give a Gift of Stock. Teaching Resources.
Subscribe to RSS
Isochron dating is a common radiometric dating technique applied to date natural events like the crystallization of minerals as they cool, changes in rocks by metamorphism, or what are essentially naturally occurring shock events like meteor strikes. Minerals present in these events contain various radioactive elements which decay and the resulting daughter elements can then be used to deduce the age of the mineral through an isochron.
The appeal of isochron dating is that it does not presuppose the initial amount of the daughter nuclide in the decay sequence. Indeed, the initial amount is not important because it can be found through this type of dating. Isochron dating began when scientists recognized difficulties with the assumptions of radiometric dating, especially how much of the daughter products might have been present when the mineral first formed.
Isochron dating has been developed in an attempt to solve such problems.
This relationship is explained by a model of local metamorphic Sr isotope This model implies that the individual isochron ages do not date specific geological.
The Bible is quite clear about the origin and timeframe for the creation of Earth and the cosmos. If Scripture is inaccurate in this, then how can it be trusted in anything else? Some evolutionists throw out theistic evolution God using evolution as His creative process as a philosophical panacea, with the goal of leading people to conclude that Genesis is a myth.
Like Nimrod of ancient times, they know they must provide an alternative i. One of the indirect evidences that evolutionists universally appeal to is radioactive dating because it appears to supply the deep time their evolutionary models demand. But how accurate is their model, and how scientific is their approach? An isochron is a line on an isotope ratio diagram denoting rock samples.
The slope of the line is related to the age of the samples. These two ratios, when plotted on a graph for many different samples from a rock suite, should hypothetically produce a straight line under certain assumed conditions. The Y intercept of that line will then provide the initial ratio of the daughter isotopes at the time the rock suite formed, and the slope m will provide the age of the rock suite. To find out how much material began the decay process long ago, we need to determine N 0 , the number of parent atoms present when the rock was formed.
But this presents a problem for any given material since no one can go back in time and measure that number. Decay constants for radioisotopes typically used in deep-time dating range from 0. One can then estimate N 0 by setting it equal to the number of daughter nuclei plus the number of parent nuclei present at the current time, assuming no daughter nuclei were present at the beginning of the decay sequence.
Radioactive Dating Explained – Part 2
An Essay on Radiometric Dating. Radiometric dating methods are the strongest direct evidence that geologists have for the age of the Earth. All these methods point to Earth being very, very old — several billions of years old. Young-Earth creationists — that is, creationists who believe that Earth is no more than 10, years old — are fond of attacking radiometric dating methods as being full of inaccuracies and riddled with sources of error.
Since only whole-rock isochrons play a significant role in the dating game anyway, [18,14] A common explanation for these cases is “mixing”.
I couldn’t find one. So I set out to write one. This article was the result. Radiometric dating methods are the strongest direct evidence that geologists have for the age of the Earth. All these methods point to Earth being very, very old — several billions of years old. Young-Earth creationists — that is, creationists who believe that Earth is no more than 10, years old — are fond of attacking radiometric dating methods as being full of inaccuracies and riddled with sources of error.